Is State Tax Rates Hiking Up THE PRICE TAG ON Vaporizers?

vaping online

Is State Tax Rates Hiking Up THE PRICE TAG ON Vaporizers?

The U.S. tobacco industry is fighting back against efforts by state regulatory bodies and consumers to modify the sale of electronic cigarettes. While vaporizers have been around for quite some time and so are becoming more acceptable in mainstream American life, the tobacco companies are determined to fight these efforts vigorously. They’ve made huge amount of money trying to defeat state taxing and regulation efforts. Now, Vape Pen Battery they’re making their next move: challenging the legality of the taxation themselves. In a new legal filing, they’re claiming that the FDA over regulates and creates a “guaranteed” interstate transportation business. The filing is currently being contested in the courts, and both sides expect an answer at some point soon.

State taxation uprights vaporizers by regulating their sale. It is estimated that about twenty states have uprights to sell vaporizer devices, including California, Colorado, D.C., Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Washington. These states have grown rapidly in recent years, and as a result, their cigarette tax rates may also be growing rapidly. Many of these same states also have placed taxes on cigar and pipe tobacco. It seems that smoking just gets more costly, and that is what the tobacco industry is shooting for.

Based on the filing with the FDA, the tobacco industry has been targeted unfairly. The tobacco industry does everything they can to fight regulation of vaporizer devices. As we’ve seen, the U.S. Supreme Court has multiple times ruled contrary to the FDA over-regulation of cigarettes. These rulings have gone the door wide open to regulation of vaporizer devices. The FDA claims that this over-regulation defeats the objective of regulating and controlling the usage of vaporizers.

The fact is that the FDA itself is not even necessary to regulate or control these industries. Only state governments have that authority. It is the state governments that impose their very own taxes, and many states have imposed increased taxes in an effort to try to curb smoking. But the state governments are themselves at a disadvantage. They can not regulate wholesale prices since these prices are regulated by state laws. They also can’t tax the product at a higher rate compared to the federal government does.

Also, the FDA itself isn’t directly mixed up in manufacturing of the vaporizer. Tobacco companies manufacture their own products, and they are those that get sued by the states and levied taxes. The FDA merely approves or denies manufacturer licenses based on whether these manufacturers follow federal law. And when the manufacturer doesn’t, then the company doesn’t get its license.

So, the states that do impose taxes on vaporizer devices do not get the benefit of having a federal regulator, or a manufacturer that is licensed by the state. So, instead, they find ways to increase taxes on the manufactures themselves! That makes no sense. Why are these manufacturers being targeted specifically? There is no real reason.

THE MEALS and Drug Administration may be the federal body in charge of regulating pharmaceuticals, dietary supplements and cosmetics. It has the power to ban the production or sale of any chemical or substance that it determines is unsafe. So, why are states trying to tell the FDA to target Vaping online users rather than tobacco manufacturers? The FDA knows that regulating weight loss supplements isn’t likely to work because there are no controlled weight loss supplements currently in the marketplace. And, even if there have been, they couldn’t force food manufacturers to sell diet pills containing things that are banned by state law.

So, instead, the states want to force the FDA to come up with some kind of rule or regulation that will require a manufacturer to sell their devices in a specific manner, according to state regulations. Which makes no sense at all. In addition, it flies when confronted with the original purpose of the Food Drug and Administration Act. Why the FDA is targeting these devices is a question that only experts in the FDA can answer.